The ootb governance tools for site lifecycle management (SLM) in SharePoint 2010 have not improved from the previous version. You're still stuck with the Site Use Confirmation and Deletion policies that will just periodically e-mail site owners and ask them to confirm that their site is still in use. There is no check for the site or its content actually being used, it is just a dumb timer job. If the site is not confirmed as still being active, the site will then be deleted - even if it is still in use. As deleting a site is not covered by any SharePoint recycle bin mechanism (coming in SP1), Microsoft also provides the site deletion capture tool on CodePlex.
Wouldn't it be nice if we could apply the information management policies for retention and disposition of content also for SharePoint 2010 sites? Yes we can :) By using a content type to identify and keep metadata for a site, the standard information management policies for content expiration can be configured to implement a recurring multistage retention policy for site disposition.
Create a site information content type and bind it to a list or library in your site definition, and ensure that this list contains one SiteInfo item with the metadata of the site. Typical metadata are site created date, site contact, site type, cost center, unit and department, is restricted site flag, last review date, next review date, and last update timestamp. Restrict edit permissions for this list to just site owners or admins.
Enable retention for the SiteInfo content type to configure your site lifecycle management policy as defined in your governance plan.
Add one or more retention stages for the SiteInfo content type as needed by your SLM policy. You will typically have a first stage that will start a workflow to notify the site owner of site expiration and ask for disposition confirmation. Make sure that the site owner knows about and enacts on your defined governance policies for manual information management, such as sending valuable documents to records management. Then there will be a second stage for performing the site disposition steps triggered by the confirmation.
You can also implement custom information management policy expiration formula or expiration action for use when configuring your retention policy. You typically do this when your policy requires retention events that are not based on date fields only. See Sahil Malik's Authoring custom expiration policies and actions in SharePoint 2007 which is still valid for SharePoint 2010.
Use a custom workflow or custom expiration action to implement the site disposition steps: user removal, automated content clean-up and archiving, and finally trigger deletion of the site. If the site is automatically deleted by a custom workflow, or marked for deletion to be processed by a custom timer job, or a custom action just sends an e-mail to the site-admin, is up to your SLM policy.
If you need to keep the site in a passive state for e.g. 6 months before deleting it, you can use a delegate control in your site master pages to prevent access to passive sites or you can move the site to an archive web-app that use a "deny write" / "deny all" access policy to prevent access. Note that the former is not real security, just content targeting for the site. The latter is real security, as "deny" web-app policies overrides site specific access rights granted to SharePoint groups and users. This allows for keeping the site users and groups "as-is" in case the site can be reactivated again according to your SLM policies. If site owners can do housekeeping on a site while passive, then grant them access by creating extra "steward" accounts that are not subject to being denied access.
I recommend removing all users from the default site members group before deleting the site, otherwise the site will not be deleted from the site memberships list in the user's my site.
The astute reader may wonder how the content type retention policy knows if the site is actually in use. The answer is quite simple; each SPWeb object provides a LastItemModifiedDate property. This timestamp is also stored in the SharePoint property bag. Use a delegate control in your site's master page to check and push the timestamp to a date-time field the SiteInfo item, so that the rentention policy can trigger on it. Remember to use SystemUpdate when updating the SiteInfo, otherwise you will change the site's LastItemModifiedDate to now. You can also use a custom expiration formula that inspects the last modified timestamp for the site when the information management policy timer job runs.
We also use the site information content type in our Puzzlepart projects to provide a search-driven site directory. It is quite simple to make a nicely categorized and searchable site catalog by simply using one or more customized the search results web-parts. This search-driven catalog can of course be sorted by the search result 'write' managed property, which must be mapped to the crawled property field that contains the LastItemModifiedDate of a site.
Using a search-driven approach makes it unnecessary to have a classic site directory list. The site metadata is simply stored directly in a list within each site, managed by the respective site owners. This is more likely to keep the site metadata up-to-date rather than going stale in a central site directory list that no one maintains.
I hope this post have given you some new ideas on how to store, manage and use site metadata both for site lifecycle management and for providing a relevant search-driven site directory.
5 comments:
Hi
it seems that I, rather frequently, find very interesting blogpost on your blog. Blog posts that sharpens my own thoughts. My favorites so far is this one and the one on using search to concatenate information from disparate locations in a SharePoint environment. You can make wonders with this search approach and a well defined information model based on content types and taxonomy.
In other words - It's possible to produce a great user experience with a minimal effort and without the need to care about the location of the information!
Yes, and now that the FAST search team is now part of the SharePoint team, we can expect to see search-driven content, navigation and user experience in general, in future versions of SharePoint.
You rock! I stumbled upon your blog when searching for site retention policies. This is a fantastic solution for a major governance issue. What a great added bonus of a searchable site directory. I'll definitely be checking back for other great insights.
Great post - thanks for sharing!
A have a question regarding the LastItemModifiedDate. Is it really stored in the Site's property bag?
By running the following ps script I am able to identify the LastItemModifiedDate:
$site = Get-SPSite("http://intranet.contoso.com/sites/test/")
foreach ($web in $site.AllWebs) {
$web | Format-List -property Title, Url, SiteAdministrators, Created, LastItemModifiedDate
}
But when I run a query on the Site's property bag it doesn't return the LastItemModifiedDate
$site = Get-SPSite("http://intranet.contoso.com/sites/test/")
foreach ($web in $site.AllWebs) {
$web.AllProperties
}
Thank you.
I think we got it of the RootWeb object, we didn'' have to iterate the lists to deduce it.
Post a Comment